US Political Opposition Voices Over the Reduction of 12,000 US Forces in Germany
"Xi Jinping and Putin Will Strengthen Their Positions"
Concerns Raised Over Procedural Flaws, Including Lack of Consultation with Allies
[Asia Economy Reporter Naju-seok] After the plan to withdraw 12,000 U.S. troops stationed in Germany was announced, criticism has emerged from the U.S. political sphere. Both the opposition Democratic Party and the ruling Republican Party have expressed concerns.
On the 29th (local time), U.S. Secretary of Defense Mark Esper announced plans to redeploy about one-third of the U.S. troops stationed in Germany to Europe and the United States. This official announcement by Secretary Esper followed President Donald Trump's expression of intent to withdraw U.S. troops from Germany. The Department of Defense plans to redeploy 5,600 of the reduced troops to Europe, while the remaining 6,400 will return to the United States.
Secretary Esper explained, "This U.S. troop redeployment will strengthen the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) and enhance deterrence against Russia." However, this differs significantly from President Trump's explanation. President Trump stated, "We are reducing U.S. troops in Germany because they are not paying," adding, "They have not fulfilled their obligations."
Both the Democratic and Republican parties expressed concerns regarding this decision. Republican Senator Ben Sasse said, "The U.S. military is not stationed around the world like traffic police or social workers but to deter the expansion of the worst regimes such as China and Russia," adding, "President Trump’s lack of strategic understanding of these issues delays response time and hinders U.S. military deterrence activities." Senator Sasse pointed out, "Forward-deploying troops ultimately reduces the tax burden on American citizens and contributes to the safety of U.S. forces," and warned, "This decision will only strengthen the positions of Chinese President Xi Jinping and Russian President Vladimir Putin."
Republican Representative Mac Thornberry also stated, "Even if there are advantages to troop redeployment, arbitrarily reducing forces stationed in a specific country like this can be problematic," and argued, "Any kind of troop redeployment requires close consultation with NATO allies."
Democratic Representative Adam Smith, chairman of the House Armed Services Committee, criticized that this decision was discussed only within the U.S. political sphere without consultation with allies or the military.
Hot Picks Today
About 100 Trillion Won at Stake... "Samsung Strike Is an Unprecedented Opportunity" as Prices Surge 20% [Taiwan Chip Column]
- "Heading for 2 Million Won": The Company the Securities Industry Says Not to Doubt [Weekend Money]
- Cellphone Dropped Under Reversing Car... Car Owner Asks, "Do I Have to Pay for Repairs?"
- "Anyone Who Visited the Room Salon, Come Forward"… Gangnam Police Station Launches Full Staff Investigation After New Scandal
- Did Samsung and SK hynix Rise Too Much?... Foreign Assets Grow Despite Selling [Weekend Money]
Democratic Senator Jack Reed said, "Secretary Esper’s job is to stand up to President Trump for the security interests of the United States," adding, "If this were the kind of issue, former Secretary of Defense James Mattis would have certainly opposed it."
© The Asia Business Daily(www.asiae.co.kr). All rights reserved.