Supreme Court Rules 'Agreement Disclosure Ordinance' Enacted by Gyeongnam Provincial Council Ineffective
Gyeongnam Province Wins Lawsuit Confirming Invalidity of Repassed Ordinance
Gyeongsangnam-do announced on the 19th that it won the lawsuit filed against the Provincial Council on May 16, 2022, regarding the "Ordinance on the Conclusion and Management of Business Agreements in Gyeongsangnam-do."
According to Gyeongnam Province, the ordinance was proposed in December 2021 by Song Sun-ho, the 11th Gyeongnam Provincial Council member from the Democratic Party of Korea, to enhance administrative accountability, transparency, and effectiveness.
The ordinance stipulates the Provincial Council's right to request documents and the obligation to report concerning business agreements concluded and managed by Gyeongnam Province.
Article 5, Paragraph 3 of the ordinance states, "If the governor includes confidentiality clauses in business agreements, it must be explicitly stated that such clauses are exempted when a Provincial Council member requests documents."
The province viewed this provision as excessively restricting the authority of the local government head and raising issues of violating higher-level laws, and thus in January 2022, inquired about this matter with the Ministry of Government Legislation.
In March of the same year, the Ministry of Government Legislation responded, "Local governments may establish necessary matters for performing autonomous duties within the scope that does not violate higher-level laws."
Despite the Ministry’s opinion, the Provincial Council partially amended the ordinance and passed it at the 3rd plenary session of the 392nd extraordinary meeting. After Gyeongnam Province requested reconsideration, the ordinance was re-approved at the 1st plenary session of the 394th extraordinary meeting and promulgated.
Gyeongnam Province filed a lawsuit to confirm the invalidity of the re-approval and requested a suspension of execution. After the Supreme Court granted the suspension request, the province finally won the case on the 13th, one year and two months later.
The Supreme Court ruling stated, "The re-approval by the Gyeongsangnam-do Provincial Council on April 27, 2022, regarding the ordinance has no effect."
Hot Picks Today
While Samsung Falters, China Rises: "Chinese DRAM" Turns a Profit in Just One Year
- "Most Americans Didn't Want This"... Americans Lose 60 Trillion Won to Soaring Fuel Costs
- "Striking Will Lead to Regret": Hyundai-Kia Employees Speak Out... Uneasy Stares Toward Samsung Union
- "That? It's Already Stashed" Nightlife Scene Crosses the Line [ChwiYak Nation] ③
- "If You Booked This Month, You Almost Lost Out... Why You Should Wait Until 'This Day' Before Paying for Flight Tickets"
"While the Information Disclosure Act, the Private Investment Act, and the Local Public Officials Act regulate information that public institutions may withhold and the confidentiality obligations of public officials, the ordinance demands disclosure without exception even for management, business, and job-related secrets, thus the ordinance’s effect is entirely denied."
© The Asia Business Daily(www.asiae.co.kr). All rights reserved.