The ruling and opposition parties engaged in a heated debate over the discharge of contaminated water from the Fukushima nuclear power plant in Japan. The People Power Party claimed that they had enforced South Korea's demands, such as real-time information sharing, to ensure the discharge was based on scientific verification, while the Democratic Party criticized the government and ruling party for representing Japan despite the IAEA's inadequate inspection.

[Image source=Yonhap News]

[Image source=Yonhap News]

View original image

At the National Assembly Foreign Affairs and Unification Committee plenary session on the 13th, People Power Party lawmaker Ha Tae-kyung stated, "The Yoon Seok-yeol administration has enforced three conditions on Japan: presenting scientific evidence and sharing information, sufficient prior consultation, and participation of Korean experts in the IAEA verification," adding, "This does not mean unconditional approval of the discharge."


Another member of the same party, Yoon Sang-hyun, said, "I am not defending Japan's position, but I hope for fact-checking," and added, "Since the Fukushima nuclear accident in 2011, contaminated water with much higher concentrations has been discharged, but inspections of Japanese seafood and processed foods showed no problems. President Yoon is acting according to the standards set by the previous administration for public safety."


On the other hand, Democratic Party lawmaker Park Hong-geun pointed out, "President Yoon remained silent before the public but effectively acknowledged the discharge very clearly during the recent (Korea-Japan) summit," and criticized, "Prime Minister Kishida did not respond to the superficial request to allow our experts to participate in the discharge inspection process."


Another member of the same party, Hwang Hee, said, "We firmly trust the IAEA report, but the IAEA used samples provided by Japan rather than collecting them directly," and added, "There is no verification of ALPS (Advanced Liquid Processing System) in the IAEA report."


Oh Young-joo, the second vice foreign minister, stated, "We hold the position that the scientific and technical review content of the IAEA report is appropriate," and added, "We will do our best, prioritizing the safety and health of the public."



Meanwhile, both ruling and opposition parties also questioned the recent use of the term 'Daehanminguk' (Republic of Korea) by Kim Yo-jong, the deputy director of the Workers' Party of North Korea. Unification Minister Kwon Young-se said, "There is a thought that this might be heading toward a two-state direction, but we need to observe a bit more."


This content was produced with the assistance of AI translation services.

© The Asia Business Daily(www.asiae.co.kr). All rights reserved.

Today’s Briefing