Unanimous Opinion: "It May Be Difficult to Uncover Quickly by Public Authority"

[Image source=Yonhap News]

[Image source=Yonhap News]

View original image

[Asia Economy Reporter Heo Kyung-jun] The Constitutional Court has ruled that the legal provision prohibiting public officials from using their positions to plan election campaigns, and setting the statute of limitations for such offenses at 10 years?unlike the statute of limitations for ordinary citizens violating the Public Official Election Act?is not unconstitutional.


On the 6th, the Constitutional Court announced that it unanimously upheld the constitutionality of Article 268, Paragraph 3 of the Public Official Election Act, which was challenged on the grounds that it violates the principle of equality, the principle of proportionality, and infringes on the political fundamental rights of public officials.


The petitioner in this case was Heo Hyun-jun, a former administrative officer who worked in the Blue House's Office of Public Communication during the Park Geun-hye administration. He was convicted in the ‘white list’ case, in which the Federation of Korean Industries was pressured between 2014 and 2016 to provide tens of billions of won to pro-government conservative organizations.



The Constitutional Court stated, "Violations of the Public Official Election Act committed by public officials using their positions seriously undermine the fairness of elections and may be systematically concealed by public authority, making it difficult to uncover within a short period. Therefore, relying on a short statute of limitations may fail to ensure the effectiveness of punishment provisions." It added, "The legislature’s decision to set the statute of limitations at 10 years after the election date is reasonable and does not violate the principle of equality."


This content was produced with the assistance of AI translation services.

© The Asia Business Daily(www.asiae.co.kr). All rights reserved.

Today’s Briefing