Priority Allocation of 5% of IPO Shares to Youth
Unsubscribed Shares Converted to General Applicants
“Providing Asset Growth Opportunities for Youth”
Under Review but Faces Criticism Over Fairness
Experts Say “Not Aligned with Global Standards”

[Exclusive] Ruling Party Considers 5% Youth Quota for IPO Subscription Allocation View original image


[Asia Economy Reporters Koo Chae-eun, Park Ji-hwan] The Democratic Party's election campaign committee is reviewing a presidential election pledge centered on allocating a portion of public offering shares to youth. The core of the plan is to prioritize 5% of the public offering subscription allocation to young people. This is interpreted as a strategic move to capture the votes of the 2030 generation, whose public offering subscriptions have surged sharply since last year.


A key official from the Democratic Party's campaign committee stated on the 19th, "We are reviewing the allocation of shares to youth in public offering subscriptions as a presidential pledge," adding, "The intention is to give priority in the stock market to young people who have had fewer opportunities to build assets through real estate compared to older generations." He continued, "We are currently refining the details," indicating that the pledge has effectively been decided.


The Democratic Party is strongly considering reducing the allocation to institutional investors and assigning about 5% to youth. Under the current Capital Markets Act, the allocation of shares in initial public offerings (IPOs) on the KOSPI market is 50% to institutions, 20% to employee stock ownership associations, and up to 30% to individual investors. Additionally, any unsubscribed shares will be converted to general subscription shares. The youth age range under consideration is 19 to 34 years old, according to the Youth Basic Act.


Candidate Lee also directly mentioned increasing the general allocation ratio for public offering shares. In November last year, at a meeting held by the Korea Exchange on "Stock Market Development and Protection of Individual Investors," Lee Jae-myung said, "It would be good to increase the allocation ratio for individual investors in public offering subscriptions. This is to provide the public with opportunities for asset formation."


[Exclusive] Ruling Party Considers 5% Youth Quota for IPO Subscription Allocation View original image


However, the response from the capital market industry is negative. Favoring a specific age group in public offering subscriptions does not align with global standards and could instead burden the market. Professor Sung Tae-yoon of Yonsei University's Department of Economics said, "It is appropriate for the campaign committee to prepare various measures to provide asset-building opportunities to young people," but added, "Giving priority to a specific age group does not fit well with the fair and smooth functioning of the capital market." Professor Kim Tae-gi of Dankook University's Department of Economics commented, "From the perspective of global investors, if the youth allocation system for public offering shares is implemented, it could be interpreted politically or seen as a special privilege," and warned, "It could have the opposite effect of achieving goals like reaching a KOSPI 5000 or inclusion in the MSCI developed markets index, which are part of Candidate Lee's pledges."



Since the equal allocation system for public offering shares was introduced in January last year to consider individual investors, there are concerns it could spark controversy over fairness. A senior official from the financial investment industry said, "Even if the allocation ratio for youth is increased, there are many cases of subscription shortfalls in small and mid-cap stocks, and the burden could fall entirely on the companies and underwriting institutions." Professor Jeon Sam-hyun of Soongsil University's Department of Law said, "The only group that is basically guaranteed a certain ratio when public offering shares are listed is employee stock ownership associations," adding, "It is questionable whether this is legally feasible, and it could potentially lead to market contraction if companies refrain from issuing new shares."


This content was produced with the assistance of AI translation services.

© The Asia Business Daily(www.asiae.co.kr). All rights reserved.

Today’s Briefing