'Criminal Record' Jehovah's Witness Member... Supreme Court Rules "Guilty of Violating Military Service Act"
[Asia Economy Reporter Bae Kyunghwan] The Supreme Court has ruled that a Jehovah's Witness who refused military enlistment on religious grounds despite a criminal record including sex crimes does not qualify for a "legitimate reason for enlistment refusal."
On the 14th, the Supreme Court's 3rd Division (Presiding Justice No Taeak) upheld the original sentence of 1 year and 6 months imprisonment in the appeal trial of Jehovah's Witness A, who was indicted for violating the Military Service Act.
A received a notice for active duty enlistment in May 2013 but refused to enlist citing being a Jehovah's Witness. However, the prosecution judged that A's refusal to enlist was not based on a "legitimate reason" as defined by the Military Service Act, considering A's repeated criminal offenses.
According to the charges, at the time of refusing enlistment, A posted photos taken of women's legs and feet three times on an online bulletin board and was fined 3 million won. A was also fined 1 million won for posting abusive language online, which constituted defamation, and stole goods worth about 280,000 won from the supermarket where A worked.
The first and second trials judged that A's refusal to serve violated the Military Service Act based on this and sentenced A to 1 year and 6 months imprisonment. A appealed, but the Supreme Court did not accept it.
Hot Picks Today
"Buy on Black Monday"... Japan's Nomura Forecasts 590,000 for Samsung, 4 Million for SK hynix
- "Plunged During the War, Now Surging Again"... The Real Reason Behind the 6% One-Day Silver Market Rally [Weekend Money]
- "Not Everyone Can Afford This: Inside the World of the True Top 0.1% [Luxury World]"
- "We're Now Earning 10 Million Won a Month"... Semiconductor Boom Drives Performance Bonuses at Major Electronic Component Firms
- Experts Are Already Watching Closely..."Target Stock Price 970,000 Won" Now Only the Uptrend Remains [Weekend Money]
The court stated, "The lower court ruled guilty on the grounds that the defendant's religious beliefs at the time of refusal were not deep or firm enough to be considered a genuine conscientious objection to military service," and "there is no error in the lower court's legal judgment."
© The Asia Business Daily(www.asiae.co.kr). All rights reserved.