[Inside Chodong]Finfluencers in the Blind Spot...Limits of Post Hoc Regulation Grow View original image

The financial authorities, who have pledged to eradicate unfair trading in the capital markets, have been paying particular attention this year to so-called "finfluencers" (finance + influencer). This is due to the belief that, amid heightened stock market volatility stemming from the Middle East, these individuals are providing inappropriate investment information or even leading unfair trades such as front-running. Authorities have formed a dedicated monitoring task force and are cracking down on such activities; last month, a YouTuber who received 600,000 won per month in exchange for recommending stocks was caught.


This shift is largely due to the rapid change in information sources for individual investors over the past few years. Individual investors no longer rely solely on securities firm reports and analyst analyses. With YouTube and social networking services (SNS) offering short, intuitive videos dominating the landscape, even securities firms and asset management companies are actively engaging in marketing using finfluencers. Their influence has become so significant that it now effectively determines investment decisions.


The problem is that, compared to their influence, the responsibilities and regulations for finfluencers remain insufficient. Most finfluencers are not financial investment professionals, so they are not subject to qualification requirements or codes of ethics. It is also easy for them to evade regulation by presenting their activities as "information provision" rather than "investment solicitation." As a result, statements that can affect the market are distributed without internal controls or prior review mechanisms. Furthermore, since these individuals act as both information providers and market participants, conflicts of interest are inevitable.


Although the authorities have announced plans to strengthen monitoring and enforcement, there are clear limitations. The line between "opinion" and "advice" is ambiguous, making it difficult to determine illegality, and it is also challenging to prove compensation in cases of paid consulting or advertising. In the case of front-running, simply tracking buy and sell flows is not enough; intentionality and causality must also be established. Managing all content spread across various platforms and channels is realistically difficult. There is also a significant gap in speed: the time it takes for a single stock recommendation video to influence investment decisions is far shorter than the time required to prove illegality. Once the market has already moved, it is difficult to reverse the damage through post hoc regulation.


Major countries such as the United States, the United Kingdom, and France are already managing finance-related content on SNS by restricting the promotion of financial products without prior approval or introducing qualification certification systems. However, what matters is not merely the timing or method of regulation. It is also important not to overlook the fact that the very way investment information is consumed is changing. Content centered on short videos and assertive messages tends to reduce complex investment decisions to simple "signals." Methods that emphasize specific price ranges or timing prompt immediate reactions from investors, which can lead to concentration in certain stocks or herd behavior. As a result, a structure is being formed in which reaction precedes analysis.



Finfluencers exist in a regulatory blind spot, and at the same time, they are a result of market changes. They have emerged due to the combination of weakened trust in traditional information systems and a new content-centric environment. Ultimately, a reevaluation of the entire financial information ecosystem is needed, beyond simply strengthening monitoring and enforcement. If the focus remains only on post hoc detection and does not extend to examining the structure of information production and distribution, regulation will continue to lag behind while the market stays one step ahead.


This content was produced with the assistance of AI translation services.

© The Asia Business Daily(www.asiae.co.kr). All rights reserved.

Today’s Briefing