Taxi Driver Qualification Revocation for Juvenile Sex Offense Conviction Ruled Constitutional by Constitutional Court
Unanimous Decision by Justices in Seven Days
"The Public Interest in Ensuring Public Safety Is Extremely Important"
The Constitutional Court has ruled that the current law, which revokes the qualifications of taxi drivers who are convicted under the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles from Sexual Abuse (Juvenile Sex Offender Act), does not violate the Constitution.
Constitutional Court Rules on Constitutional Complaint Regarding Disqualification of Taxi Drivers with Juvenile Sex Offender Records under the Juvenile Sex Offender Act. Yonhap News
View original imageOn May 29, the Constitutional Court unanimously decided that Article 87, Paragraph 1, Subparagraph 3 of the Passenger Transport Service Act?which stipulates the revocation of taxi driver qualifications during the probation period for those sentenced to suspended imprisonment or higher for molesting children or juveniles through deception or authority?is constitutional.
The Court stated, "It is of great public interest to exclude individuals who have been sentenced to suspended imprisonment or higher for molesting children or juveniles through deception or authority from taxi driving duties, in order to protect the public from crime, alleviate public anxiety about using passenger transport services, and ensure public safety in road traffic." The Court further noted, "The provision under review meets the requirement of balancing legal interests."
The Court added, "Because taxis have various destinations and arrival times and operate even late at night, the probability that passengers will be exposed to danger is significantly higher compared to other forms of public transportation such as buses," and emphasized, "There is a need for relatively strict regulation regarding taxi driver qualifications."
In this constitutional complaint case, the petitioner, a private taxi driver identified as Mr. A, was convicted in February last year of violating the Juvenile Sex Offender Act for molesting a child or juvenile and was sentenced to 1 year and 6 months in prison, suspended for 3 years. The sentence became final. In May last year, the Mayor of Busan revoked Mr. A's taxi driver qualification. Mr. A filed an administrative lawsuit, but it was dismissed. He then filed a constitutional complaint, claiming the provision was unconstitutional.
Hot Picks Today
If They Fail Next Year, Bonus Drops to 97 Million Won... A Closer Look at Samsung Electronics DS Division’s 600M vs 460M vs 160M Performance Bonuses
- Opening a Bank Account in Korea Is Too Difficult..."Over 150,000 Won in Notarization Fees Just for a Child's Account and Debit Card" [Foreigner K-Finance Status]②
- Trump: "Talks in Final Stages," Iran Reviewing U.S. Proposal... Oil Prices Plunge 5% (Comprehensive)
- Room Prices Soar from 60,000 to 760,000 Won and Sudden Cancellations: "We Won't Even Buy Water in Busan" — BTS Fans Outraged
- "Who Is Visiting Japan These Days?" The Once-Crowded Tourist Spots Empty Out... What's Happening?
However, the Constitutional Court stated, "If the court chose a suspended sentence of imprisonment or incarceration after considering all circumstances, it means the possibility of social condemnation is by no means insignificant," and added, "Given that the driver can regain qualification after the probation period ends, the disadvantage imposed on the taxi driver is limited."
© The Asia Business Daily(www.asiae.co.kr). All rights reserved.