Sex Discrimination Lawsuit Filed Against 'Women Only' Exhibition...Artist Says "Rather Glad"
Male Viewer Files Complaint Alleging "Violation of Anti-Discrimination Law"
Artist States "The 'Rejection' Experienced by Men Is the Artwork"
A museum in Australia held a women-only exhibition and was sued for gender discrimination by a male visitor. However, the artist who planned the exhibition said, "I am glad this case has led to a lawsuit."
On the 20th (local time), British Guardian, American New York Times (NYT), and others reported that a discrimination lawsuit was recently filed against the Museum of Old and New Art (MONA) in Hobart, Tasmania, Australia. The plaintiff is a man named Jason Lau.
The controversial exhibition is "Ladies Lounge," curated and planned by artist Kirsha Kaechele. This exhibition blocks male visitors from entering, and female visitors can enjoy simple refreshments and champagne while viewing the artworks upon payment. However, visitors who do not identify themselves as female are not allowed entry.
Kaechele revealed that she was inspired by a man she met years ago at an Australian pub who said, "You would feel more comfortable in a women-only lounge bar." Australian women were not allowed to enter pubs in public places until 1965, and women-only lounge bars are known as a unique Australian cultural phenomenon that arose from this.
Exhibition 'Ladies Lounge' at MONA Museum [Image source=Captured from MONA Museum official website]
View original imageIn response, Lau filed a lawsuit against the exhibition, and at a hearing held on the 19th at the Tasmanian Civil and Administrative Tribunal, he argued, "This exhibition violates the Anti-Discrimination Act by banning men, including myself, from entry." He added, "I paid 35 Australian dollars (about 30,000 KRW) for admission," and "Anyone who purchases a ticket would expect products and services to be provided fairly."
However, Kaechele said, "That is exactly the core of what I intended with this exhibition," and "The 'rejection' experienced by men is the artwork itself." It is a kind of "mirroring" of Australian society, where women have historically been given fewer opportunities. Mirroring is an expression or persuasion strategy that intentionally causes discomfort by reversing the sides to raise issues such as discrimination.
The key issue in this lawsuit, with a verdict expected within a month, is likely to be the interpretation of Article 26 of the Tasmanian Anti-Discrimination Act. This provision exceptionally allows discrimination to provide equal opportunities to marginalized or disadvantaged groups, such as men-only clubs or women-only gyms.
Catherine Scott, the museum's attorney, evaluated, "This case shows that art can be a powerful medium to promote equal opportunities through dialogue and especially to correct past exclusions of women."
Hot Picks Today
"It Has Now Crossed Borders": No Vaccine or Treatment as Bundibugyo Ebola Variant Spreads [Reading Science]
- "Stocks Are Not Taxed, but Annual Crypto Gains Over 2.5 Million Won to Be Taxed Next Year... Investors Push Back"
- "Even With a 90 Million Won Salary and Bonuses, It Doesn’t Feel Like Much"... A Latecomer Rookie Who Beat 70 to 1 Odds [Scientists Are Disappearing] ③
- "Am I Really in the Top 30%?" and "Worried About My Girlfriend in the Bottom 70%"... Buzz Over High Oil Price Relief Fund
- "Who Is Visiting Japan These Days?" The Once-Crowded Tourist Spots Empty Out... What's Happening?
Meanwhile, in an interview with the Australian Guardian, Kaechele said, "It was very interesting to see the artwork come alive vividly in the courtroom," and "The dream of the artwork leaving the museum and entering a completely new 'realm of the world' has been realized."
© The Asia Business Daily(www.asiae.co.kr). All rights reserved.