The Youth Emergency Committee Members of the United Future Party's 'Bitter Words'... "Our Party Feels Like a Motae Solo"

Kim Jaeseop "We Must Speak Firmly Against Corrupt Establishments"
Jung Wonseok "The Younger Generation Recognizes Ability"

[Image source=Yonhap News]

[Asia Economy Reporter Lim Chun-han] The youth emergency committee members of the United Future Party poured out harsh criticism on the 24th at the 'Myeongbulheojeon Conservative' study group for first-term lawmakers. At this gathering, critical perspectives from the younger generation were raised, such as "You can't date a lifelong single" and "The difference between the United Future Party's cider and the late Roh Hoe-chan of the Justice Party's cider." Myeongbulheojeon Conservative is a study group for first-term lawmakers with about 20 participants, including lawmakers Heo Eun-ah and Jeon Ju-hye.

Committee member Kim Jae-seop stated at the first-term lawmakers' study group held at the National Assembly Members' Office Building on the 24th, "Our party is said to feel like a lifelong single. They understand our party's sincerity, but the method is inappropriate and burdensome," adding, "They say they'd rather date a playboy than a lifelong single. To escape being a lifelong single, we really need to meet many young people and make efforts to win their hearts."

Kim also mentioned the controversy over the direct employment of Incheon Airport Corporation employees, saying, "To win over the hearts of the 20s and 30s generation, we need to actively send the message that we are on your side, not the side of the strong," and added, "There is a need to redefine the meaning of vested interests. We must firmly address and take clear measures against outdated and corrupt vested interests."

Committee member Jeong Won-seok emphasized, "The younger generation recognizes ability. Isn't there a flex culture?" He stressed, "When they judge adults, if they can feel that adults achieve things by their own power and breathe for them, then ability and expertise will not be perceived as vested interests."

Jeong further said, "Why did Committee Chairman Kim Jong-in bring up basic income and Baek Jong-won? Why did he say we should not use the term conservative?" He explained, "Because the first impression of conservatism is not good, unless we fundamentally innovate to touch the sensibilities of voters, even if we present something new, we cannot win their hearts."

Jeong pointed out, "The difference between the United Future Party's cider and the late Roh Hoe-chan of the Justice Party's cider, and the difference between the United Future Party's George Floyd and America's George Floyd is that we only imitated the form." He criticized, "Lawmaker Roh is firmly established as a politician who fought against vested interests, so he is persuasive to the public. If the United Future Party suddenly acts like cider, it is hard to understand. America's George Floyd case falls under anti-discrimination law, but the United Future Party does not acknowledge some parts of the anti-discrimination law, so how can it be persuasive?"

This content was produced with the assistance of AI translation services.