Victim Death... Charge Changed from Rape and Injury to Rape Murder
Rape Murder Punishment Only Life Imprisonment or Death Penalty
"Current Facts Recognize Possible Intent"

With the death of the victim in the 'Gwanaksan Dulle-gil sexual assault' case, the suspect Choi Mo (30, male) has had his charge changed from rape and injury to rape-murder, and the police are concentrating their investigative efforts on proving his intent to kill. Rape-murder, which applies when the perpetrator has the intent to kill during the sexual assault, is legally punishable only by death or life imprisonment, making it one of the most severe crimes under current law, aside from treason which mandates only the death penalty. Experts believe that based on the facts revealed so far, the charge of rape-murder can be sufficiently applied.


Suspect Choi is leaving Gwanak Police Station for the warrant hearing held at the Seoul Central District Court on the 19th. [Image source=Yonhap News]

Suspect Choi is leaving Gwanak Police Station for the warrant hearing held at the Seoul Central District Court on the 19th. [Image source=Yonhap News]

View original image

The police investigating the 'Gwanaksan Dulle-gil sexual assault' case changed the charge from rape and injury to rape-murder after the victim, Ms. A, who had been hospitalized in the intensive care unit, passed away on the 19th. Choi is accused of assaulting and sexually assaulting the victim, Ms. A, in a forested area off the Gwanaksan Dulle-gil trail connected to a park in Sillim-dong on the 17th.


The police applied the charge of rape-murder instead of rape resulting in death. The distinction between rape resulting in death and rape-murder depends on the presence of 'intent to kill.' If there is intent to sexually assault and kill, it is rape-murder; if there is no intent to kill, it is rape resulting in death, which carries a significant difference in sentencing. Rape resulting in death is punishable by life imprisonment or imprisonment of 10 years or more, whereas rape-murder is punishable only by life imprisonment or death. Choi denies the intent to kill. Earlier, on the 19th, during the pre-trial detention hearing, when asked by reporters about his intent to kill, Choi responded, "There was none."


According to Supreme Court rulings, if the defendant claims there was no intent to kill, the court comprehensively assesses the defendant’s motive, the circumstances leading to the crime, the presence, type, and use of any prepared weapons, the location and repetition of attacks, and the likelihood of the fatal outcome to determine intent. Attorney Lee Hoseok of Taeha Law Firm stated, "The police will likely focus on proving whether the suspect inflicted injuries while foreseeing the victim’s death to some extent."


To prove Choi’s intent to murder, the police have conducted searches of Choi’s mobile phone carrier and the National Health Insurance Service to review call records and any history of mental illness. They also secured statements indicating that Choi purchased the knuckle duster used as the weapon in April for the purpose of sexual assault, that the crime scene was close to his home, and that he frequently visited the area for exercise, knowing there were no CCTV cameras. Additionally, the police confirmed that Choi left his residence in Doksan-dong, Geumcheon-gu at 9:55 a.m., arrived near the crime scene at 11:01 a.m., and committed the crime within an hour.


Forest path leading to the site of the sexual assault incident on Gwanaksan Dullegil. <br>[Photo by Hwang Seoyul]

Forest path leading to the site of the sexual assault incident on Gwanaksan Dullegil.
[Photo by Hwang Seoyul]

View original image

Experts analyzed that the facts confirmed so far are sufficient to prove intent to kill. Seung Jaehyun, a research fellow at the Korea Institute of Criminal Justice Policy, said, "The degree of oppression inflicted on the victim was not just to restrain but to attack until the victim became unconscious on the spot, making it difficult to deny the presence of at least implied intent, and it could even be considered as clear intent. Choi’s attack is also seen as having a direct causal relationship with the victim’s death."



Attorney Lee Eun-ui of Eun-ui Law Office also said, "This case is a typical rape-murder case," adding, "The fact that a man wearing knuckles attacked a female victim fundamentally indicates at least implied intent to kill." She further stated, "If the perpetrator commits the crime without regard for the victim’s life during the rape, it can be charged as rape-murder." Meanwhile, the Seoul Metropolitan Police Agency plans to hold a personal information disclosure review committee on the 23rd to decide whether to disclose Choi’s personal information.


This content was produced with the assistance of AI translation services.

© The Asia Business Daily(www.asiae.co.kr). All rights reserved.

Today’s Briefing