US Federal Judge Orders Biden Administration to Restrict Contact with SNS Companies: "No Censorship Allowed"

Trump-Appointed Judge: "Government Oppression Confirmed by Substantial Evidence"
Communication Ban Except for Some Issues Like Security... White House "Reviewing Order"

A U.S. court has issued a preliminary injunction restricting contact between the Joe Biden administration and social networking service (SNS) companies. The court expressed concern that if the Biden administration excessively interferes with SNS posts and posting policies, it could violate the First Amendment, which guarantees freedom of expression. With the upcoming presidential election next year, the debate over the government's role amid the two values of "blocking the spread of misinformation" and "protecting freedom of expression" is expected to intensify.

President Joe Biden [Photo by AP News]

On the 4th (local time), according to the Washington Post (WP) and the Wall Street Journal (WSJ), Terry Doughty, a judge of the Louisiana District Court, issued a 155-page order that day, imposing a preliminary injunction broadly restricting White House and federal agency officials from contacting SNS companies.

This ruling came after former attorneys general from Missouri and Louisiana, both Republicans, raised concerns that the Biden administration had fostered a massive "federal censorship enterprise" under the pretext of combating misinformation circulating on SNS.

They argued that the federal government effectively censored dissenting views by exploiting the COVID-19 pandemic and the threat of misinformation. In particular, they filed a lawsuit claiming that government officials excessively encouraged SNS companies to respond to messages that hindered COVID-19 vaccinations or attempted to overturn the election. They also alleged that the administration demanded the removal of posts related to Hunter Biden, President Biden's second son.

Judge Doughty ruled that the Biden administration's actions violated the First Amendment, which protects freedom of expression. He stated, "During the COVID-19 pandemic, marked by widespread suspicion and uncertainty, it appears the U.S. government saw itself as playing a role similar to the 'Ministry of Truth' from George Orwell's novel '1984,' determining what is true."

He further noted that the plaintiffs presented substantial evidence proving they were victims of an extensive censorship campaign, and that the removal of posts was primarily aligned with conservative viewpoints.

[Image source=AP Yonhap News]

Considering these circumstances, Judge Doughty ordered, based on the First Amendment, that several government agencies?including the Department of Justice, Department of State, Department of Health and Human Services, and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)?are "restricted from encouraging, pressuring, coercing, or persuading SNS companies to delete, suppress, or reduce content that expresses freedom of speech." However, exceptions apply to certain issues such as national security threats, criminal activities, and voter intimidation.

Appointed during the Donald Trump administration, Judge Doughty is known to have conservative leanings. Although this order was issued to block government communication with SNS companies before a final ruling on the case, foreign media have assessed that it effectively sided with the Republican plaintiffs.

This order is expected to deepen the debate over the government's role in preventing the spread of misinformation on SNS.

The WP commented, "The government has attempted to cooperate with SNS companies to address various crimes such as child sexual abuse and terrorism, but this ruling could undermine those efforts." Since the 2016 election, the U.S. government has actively communicated with SNS companies, peaking during the COVID-19 period, and this process could now be halted entirely.

Evelyn Duke, a professor at Stanford University, evaluated, "This order is remarkably broad and clearly intends to block contact between government officials and SNS platforms."

Especially amid growing concerns over the spread of deepfakes fueled by this year's artificial intelligence (AI) boom and with the U.S. presidential election scheduled for November next year, the challenge of protecting freedom of expression while addressing misinformation circulating on SNS is expected to become even more complex.

Regarding this order, the White House told the WP that the defendant Department of Justice is reviewing the court's order. It added, "The Biden administration has only encouraged measures to protect public health and safety when foreign interference occurred in the pandemic and elections," emphasizing, "Our administration consistently holds the view that SNS platforms should act responsibly toward Americans while maintaining independent discretion over the information they provide."

This content was produced with the assistance of AI translation services.