Court: "Prosecution Service's Non-Indictment of Yoon Seok-yeol for 'Han Myeong-sook Obstruction of Perjury Investigation' is Justified"… Sasaehaeng's Reconsideration Request Dismissed
President-elect Yoon Suk-yeol is meeting with Philippe Lefort, the French Ambassador to Korea, at the transition committee office in Tongui-dong, Jongno-gu, Seoul, on the 27th. Photo by Transition Committee Press Corps
View original image[Asia Economy Reporter Choi Seok-jin, Legal Affairs Specialist] The court has ruled that the decision by the High-ranking Officials' Crime Investigation Unit (PCC) to not indict President-elect Yoon Seok-yeol, who was accused of obstructing the investigation into the 'Former Prime Minister Han Myeong-sook's false testimony coaching case,' was justified.
According to the legal community on the 29th, the Seoul High Court Criminal Division 30 (Presiding Judges Bae Gwang-guk, Jo Jin-gu, Park Eun-young) dismissed the rehearing petition filed by the civic group Judicial Justice Restoration Civic Action (Sasaehaeng) against the PCC's non-indictment decision regarding President-elect Yoon.
The court stated the reason for dismissal, saying, "After thoroughly reviewing the case records and all materials submitted by the petitioner, the prosecutor's non-indictment decision can be accepted, and there is a lack of evidence to recognize the non-indictment decision as unjust."
A rehearing petition is a system where the complainant or accuser requests the court to reconsider a non-indictment decision made by the prosecution or PCC. If the court accepts the rehearing petition, the prosecution must file charges.
The suspicion of 'obstruction of investigation into former Prime Minister Han's false testimony coaching case' involves allegations that President-elect Yoon and former Legal Research and Training Institute Director Cho Nam-gwan, who were Prosecutor General and Deputy Chief Prosecutor of the Supreme Prosecutors' Office respectively in May 2020, obstructed the investigation into prosecutors coaching witnesses to give false testimony in former Prime Minister Han's trial.
The PCC initiated an investigation last year after Sasaehaeng's accusation, charging the two with abuse of authority and dereliction of duty, but in February this year, they were cleared due to insufficient evidence.
Hot Picks Today
If They Fail Next Year, Bonus Drops to 97 Million Won... A Closer Look at Samsung Electronics DS Division’s 600M vs 460M vs 160M Performance Bonuses
- Opening a Bank Account in Korea Is Too Difficult..."Over 150,000 Won in Notarization Fees Just for a Child's Account and Debit Card" [Foreigner K-Finance Status]②
- SpaceX Pursues 'Largest Ever' Mega IPO... Profitability of Space Business Still Unclear
- Room Prices Soar from 60,000 to 760,000 Won and Sudden Cancellations: "We Won't Even Buy Water in Busan" — BTS Fans Outraged
- "Who Is Visiting Japan These Days?" The Once-Crowded Tourist Spots Empty Out... What's Happening?
Regarding the rehearing petition filed by Lim Eun-jung, the Ministry of Justice's Inspection Officer who separately accused President-elect Yoon, the court's decision has not yet been made.
© The Asia Business Daily(www.asiae.co.kr). All rights reserved.