Possibility of Re-discussion on Intent for Full Review
Industry Focused on What Solutions Will Be Found

Ko Seung-beom, the nominee for Chairman of the Financial Services Commission, is delivering an opening statement at the confirmation hearing held at the National Assembly on the 27th. Photo by Yoon Dong-joo doso7@

Ko Seung-beom, the nominee for Chairman of the Financial Services Commission, is delivering an opening statement at the confirmation hearing held at the National Assembly on the 27th. Photo by Yoon Dong-joo doso7@

View original image

[Asia Economy Reporter Kiho Sung] Interest is growing as the newly appointed Financial Services Commission Chairman, Go Seung-beom, acknowledged a lack of communication regarding the launch of the refinancing loan platform (loan switching) and whether a solution can be found. In particular, since Chairman Go expressed his intention to conduct a full review, there is also anticipation that sensitive issues such as fees may be reconsidered.


According to the financial sector on the 1st, the meeting between the Financial Services Commission and big tech companies (large information and communication companies) regarding the refinancing loan platform, which was scheduled for the previous day, was postponed again. The meeting had already been postponed once from the original date of the 24th of last month, and the rescheduled date has not yet been decided.


Within the financial sector, while cancellations of schedules between the FSC and industry sectors are not uncommon, there is speculation that internal adjustments at the regulatory level are taking time following Chairman Go’s statement about a “full review.”


Earlier, Chairman Go responded at the National Assembly’s Political Affairs Committee confirmation hearing, saying, "It seems that complete agreement between big tech companies and the financial sector was not achieved," and added, "We will proceed with further discussions and conduct a full review from the beginning."


The refinancing loan platform is a service that allows financial consumers to compare loan interest rates from various financial institutions such as banks and insurance companies at a glance through mobile applications (apps) and switch to those with lower rates. However, commercial banks have consistently opposed it, viewing various aspects such as fees as being unilaterally favorable to big tech companies.


Accordingly, banks are promoting a joint refinancing loan platform led by banks instead of platforms led by big tech and fintech companies. Recently, the secondary financial sector has also been actively participating in the joint platform. A banking sector official said, "We will soon begin consultations with each industry sector," adding, "The secondary financial sector also holds a positive stance." In particular, regarding one of the most sensitive issues, fees, the joint platform is considering a plan where operating costs are shared as membership fees.


The financial sector believes that if banks launch their own independent refinancing loan platform, the government’s intention to reduce the interest burden on ordinary citizens by making it easier to switch all household loans will be undermined. Therefore, it is widely expected that the success or failure of the project will depend on the position Chairman Go takes.



A financial sector official pointed out, "If Chairman Go’s position is to review from scratch, discussions should be conducted from zero base," adding, "If discussions proceed with a set goal, there is a high possibility of confusion again."


This content was produced with the assistance of AI translation services.

© The Asia Business Daily(www.asiae.co.kr). All rights reserved.

Today’s Briefing