On the morning of the 7th, representatives from the Citizens' Coalition for Democratic Media came to the Seoul Central District Prosecutors' Office in Seocho-dong, Seoul, to submit a complaint against Channel A reporter Lee Dong-jae and an unnamed prosecutor related to MBC's report on the 'collusion between prosecutors and media.' They are responding to questions from the press. Photo by Kim Hyung-min

On the morning of the 7th, representatives from the Citizens' Coalition for Democratic Media came to the Seoul Central District Prosecutors' Office in Seocho-dong, Seoul, to submit a complaint against Channel A reporter Lee Dong-jae and an unnamed prosecutor related to MBC's report on the 'collusion between prosecutors and media.' They are responding to questions from the press. Photo by Kim Hyung-min

View original image

[Asia Economy Reporters Seokjin Choi and Hyungmin Kim] The suspicion of collusion between Channel A reporter and the prosecution, which surfaced through an MBC report, has ultimately led to a prosecution complaint.


As it became known that the whistleblower is a staunch supporter of the current government, political parties are engaged in disputes, and attention is focused on how far the truth will be uncovered through the prosecution's investigation.


On the morning of the 7th, the Citizens' Coalition for Democratic Media (MinEonRyeon) filed a complaint at the Seoul Central District Prosecutors' Office against Channel A reporter Dongjae Lee and an unnamed prosecutor appearing in the MBC report on charges of intimidation.


Around 10 a.m. that day, Kim Seo-jung, co-executive director of MinEonRyeon, who came to submit the complaint at the Seoul Central District Prosecutors' Office in Seocho-dong, Seoul, said, "It is unacceptable for a reporter to conduct reporting through intimidation, and a media company with such a reporter is practically as good as receiving a death sentence as journalists," adding, "I thought this was wrong and should never happen again, so I considered what legal measures could be taken and concluded that it was clear intimidation, so we filed a complaint on charges of intimidation."


He also emphasized the need to reveal the identity of the unnamed current prosecutor. Attorney Lee Dae-ho of Deoksu Law Firm, who drafted the complaint, pointed out, "It seems that the reporter could not have acted alone to cause criminal disadvantage to former representative Lee, and there was an open agreement with the prosecutor."


Regarding the charges, Attorney Lee explained, "This case was not conducted to obtain financial gain, so considering this, we filed the complaint on charges of intimidation," and added, "Personally, coercion charges could also be applicable, but based on the current information, it was deemed insufficient, so only the definite intimidation charges were included in the complaint."


On the 31st of last month, MBC reported that a Channel A legal team reporter approached the side of former Value Investment CEO Lee Cheol, who is imprisoned in connection with the SillaJen case, and demanded information about the misconduct of Yoo Si-min, director of the Roh Moo-hyun Foundation. The report also stated that during the process, the reporter played a phone call with a chief prosecutor known to be a close aide of Prosecutor General Yoon Seok-yeol to flaunt their connection.


However, immediately after the report, the chief prosecutor in question stated that he was not the prosecutor appearing in the recording.


The Ministry of Justice, after receiving this internal investigation report from the Supreme Prosecutors' Office, has instructed a supplementary investigation.


There is no dispute in the legal or media circles that there was a problem with reporter Lee's reporting methods. In particular, the fact that reporter Lee mentioned the family while seemingly implying that he could influence the prosecution investigation to the side of former CEO Lee, who is imprisoned, has led to many opinions that it could constitute intimidation or violation of the Attorney-at-Law Act depending on the circumstances.


However, the core issue in this case is not whether reporter Lee will face criminal punishment individually, but whether, as MBC reported, there was actual information sharing or transactions between reporter Lee and prosecution officials regarding the SillaJen investigation or misconduct of current government officials.


If any such circumstances are revealed through the prosecution's investigation, Prosecutor General Yoon's prosecution will inevitably suffer serious damage.



On the other hand, if it is revealed that the report was orchestrated by fervent supporters of the current government and some ruling party politicians to shake Prosecutor General Yoon, as some conservative media have alleged, the repercussions will also be significant.


This content was produced with the assistance of AI translation services.

© The Asia Business Daily(www.asiae.co.kr). All rights reserved.

Today’s Briefing