Conspiracy Theories Spread Faster Than Gunshots... Surge in "Staged" Claims After Trump Dinner Shooting

Immediately after a shooting occurred at the White House Correspondents' Dinner venue, conspiracy theories and misinformation spread online more quickly than the facts about the incident. Unsubstantiated posts flooded social media, ranging from claims that the attack-apparently aimed at U.S. President Donald Trump-was "staged," to rumors of the suspect's death and speculation about involvement by certain countries.

On April 26, Yonhap News, citing the New York Times (NYT) and others, reported that unverified claims and attributions of responsibility quickly spread on major social media platforms such as X, Facebook, and TikTok following news of the shooting at the White House Correspondents' Dinner.

According to the social media analytics company TweetBinder, by around noon on the 26th, more than 300,000 posts containing the word "staged," meaning "manipulated" or "directed," were uploaded on X. Photo by AP Yonhap News

원본보기 아이콘

The fastest-spreading theory was the conspiracy that the incident was "staged." Some users, without any concrete evidence, claimed that either President Trump's camp or other political forces orchestrated the shooting incident to divert attention from low approval ratings or criticism over the Iran war, among other political setbacks. According to the social media analytics company TweetBinder, by around noon on the 26th, more than 300,000 posts containing the word "staged," meaning "manipulated" or "orchestrated," were uploaded on X. The NYT noted that while some of these posts refuted the conspiracy, conspiracy theories quickly filled the information void that emerged immediately after the shooting.

False claims about the suspect also proliferated. Some users, again without evidence, linked the suspect to Israel and shared images that appeared to be manipulated by artificial intelligence (AI) as if they were proof. Russian state media outlet RT reportedly helped recirculate some of the unverified claims that appeared on social media. Claims that "the suspect was shot dead at the scene" also spread in the immediate aftermath, but it was later confirmed that the suspect was actually arrested at the scene. Posts that tried to definitively characterize the suspect's political views or motives for the crime continued to appear, but most of these details had not been officially confirmed by investigators.

At a press conference held after the shooting incident at the White House Correspondents' Dinner, a memo seen in the possession of Muriel Bowser, Mayor of the District of Columbia. Photo by AP News

원본보기 아이콘

The NYT pointed out that this phenomenon is tied to the competition for views among certain influencers and the profit structures of social media platforms. On platforms such as X, where follower counts and views can be directly linked to revenue, unverified posts can spread rapidly in the wake of major incidents. False information spread much faster than any corrections. According to the NYT, in some cases, a post would rack up millions of views before the author posted a correction, but the correction never attracted as much attention as the original false claim.

Experts say that the "information vacuum" that occurs before facts are confirmed in the aftermath of major incidents fuels the spread of conspiracy theories. Cliff Lampe, a professor at the University of Michigan, told the NYT, "People are not necessarily looking for good information; they are looking for information that affirms what they want to believe," adding, "Rumors spread very quickly, but it can take a much longer time to correct an error." Amanda Crawford, a professor at the University of Connecticut, also said, "It takes time to establish the truth and credible information, but the public does not always have that patience. That vacuum is filled by manipulated narratives, which often reflect the biases of those who share them."

President Trump's online remarks also fueled the controversy. After the incident, he claimed that the reason he had tried to build a new banquet hall on the White House grounds was precisely because of such security issues. Subsequently, some right-wing influencers posted a series of comments arguing that building the banquet hall promoted by President Trump was urgently needed to strengthen White House security. However, the NYT pointed out that this year's dinner was not held at the White House but at the Washington Hilton Hotel. Claims directly linking the incident to White House facility security could thus cloud the facts.

At the White House dinner held in Washington, protesters outside the police responded to an incident at the Washington Hilton by demonstrating. Photo by AP Yonhap News

원본보기 아이콘

Furthermore, a moment during a phone interview with Fox News White House correspondent Aishah Hasnie, when the call was cut off, became fodder for conspiracy theories. Some users claimed that the broadcaster had deliberately cut her testimony, but Hasnie later explained that the communications signal inside the venue was poor. Ultimately, this incident demonstrated, as much as the shock of the shooting itself, just how rapidly false information can spread on social media in the wake of major events. Fact-checking takes time, but conspiracy theories do not wait for the truth.

© The Asia Business Daily(www.asiae.co.kr). All rights reserved.