Gyeongnam Labor Commission’s ‘Catering Contractor Bargaining Notice’ Decision Sparks Backlash... Criticism Grows Over “Procedures Without Legal Review”

Who should the employees of subcontractors operating corporate cafeterias through competitive bidding engage in collective bargaining with?

The Gyeongnam Regional Labor Relations Commission's decision to include the union's collective bargaining request notice for Hanwha Ocean’s catering contractor is creating shockwaves across the industry. Criticism continues, especially as the commission did not clarify its legal interpretation regarding the central issue of “the principal company's status as an employer.”

Recently, the Gyeongnam Regional Labor Relations Commission accepted an objection filed by the Metal Workers’ Union and instructed that the Welliv branch be included in the public notice. However, it did not clearly state whether or not the principal company is to be recognized as an employer, nor did it disclose the basis for such a determination.

The core of the controversy lies in the order of legal application. The revised Trade Union Act stipulates that the principal company is obligated to bargain only if it “substantially and specifically controls or determines the working conditions” of subcontracted workers. However, critics point out that this decision demanded bargaining procedures without making such a determination, resulting in a lack of legal review.

Legal professionals in the Gyeongnam region have raised concerns that this may contradict the Ministry of Employment and Labor’s interpretive guidelines. One legal industry insider commented, “It is unusual for procedures to be advanced without a legal determination,” adding, “Such confusion could become a burden not only for the manufacturing sector but also across industries like distribution and logistics.”

This issue could go beyond a single company’s labor-management relationship and potentially shake the entire outsourcing and subcontracting structure. If the principal company’s employer status is broadly acknowledged even for subcontracted companies, some predict that the very foundation of the industrial structure could be destabilized.

The Gyeongnam Regional Labor Relations Commission’s decision has also sparked controversy over “avoiding judgment.” Some argue that the commission is making decisions without setting clear standards in high-stakes cases, thereby passing the final decision-making responsibility to the Central Labor Relations Commission or the courts.

Welliv, at the center of the dispute, differs from a typical cooperative company directly participating in production. It is an independent corporation with annual sales of 120 billion won, operating group catering, facility management, and travel businesses at over 50 locations nationwide. Apart from Hanwha Ocean, it provides catering and facility management at over 50 sites across the country, including Homeplus, DSEC, SJ Tech, Daewoo Hospital, Geoje College, and the Government Gyeongbuk Regional Joint Office, among others. The controversy over employer status has intensified because Welliv is not structurally dependent on any specific principal company.

This decision is likely to have an impact not only on individual workplaces but on the entire subcontracting structure. Currently, many manufacturing sites outsource catering and facility management. There are concerns that if the principal company’s bargaining obligations are expanded in this structure, similar demands could spread.

The business community believes that the entire framework of outsourcing contracts could be shaken. If employer status is broadly recognized for external companies, it could affect the contractual structure between companies themselves.

Song Kyung-shik, Chairman of the Korea Employers Federation, said, “Even the cafeteria workers at Hanwha Ocean are now seeking to bargain directly with the principal company. Catering workers are people who have contracts with the catering company’s CEO. It is not an area for the principal company to intervene.”

The Yellow Envelope Law was introduced to strengthen the principal company’s responsibility in areas where it exercises substantial influence. However, this latest decision is being criticized for expanding the scope of application without providing clear standards, thereby increasing confusion in the field.

Experts point out that criteria for determining employer status must be clarified. They worry that, if such standards remain vague and similar cases continue to arise, uncertainty and labor-management conflict could grow across the industrial sector.

원본보기 아이콘

© The Asia Business Daily(www.asiae.co.kr). All rights reserved.